Negligent Discharge
Okay, so Leanne and I made a T-shirt, and it has nothing to do with Star Wars. But that’s also why we were able to make merchandise for it. It’s a shirt celebrating H.P. Lovecraft, another interest of ours. For those that don’t know much about him, I’m about to try and dispel some misconceptions about him and his work, and explain why I think his work might interest many of our readers. As you guys know, we will never be able to do anything financially with Blue Milk Special as it is a fan project, and regardless of parody laws we have no intention of perturbing LucasFilm and Disney. That’s why it is always awesome to interest our primarily Star Wars readership in our other projects and work. And for those that already love H.P., you can support us and represent Lovecraft with Leanne’s cartoon portrait of him, complete with a tome with the Elder Sign under his arm!
For those people not steeped in the worlds of H.P. Lovecraft, the impression they tend to have is often far from the actual source material written between 1917-1936. People have probably seen some of the tacky B-movies that have been awful “adaptations” of some of his works, or they have seen the cutesy Cthulhu octopus monster, or think Lovecraftian means tentacles.
I even get the odd person who says “you like Lovecraft? Wasn’t he a racist?” Yes he was, and so was Robert E. Howard, creator of Conan, and sadly so were the majority of people in the past. Many of the famous painters and writers all the way back to the Renaissance were probably racist and perhaps even homophobic too. Sadly, because a good friend of mine asked me that very question about Lovecraft, I feel I have to address the matter as part of this conversation here too.
His views, which he did express in writing since a teenager, thankfully were views that evolved and matured as he slowly began to come out of his sheltered upbringing and explore the world. I’m not an apologist in any way, but Lovecraft’s ignorance, was massively widespread among citizens of the world in that time period. Individuals of the 19th and 20th century that were progressive and championed anti-racist attitudes were sadly an exception. It took generations of work and reasoned arguments to get us to the point we are at today, and we still have a long way to go ourselves. We still have a big problem, particularly from my point-of-view here in the United States, with what is now a more underground and repressed form of racism. Sadly, most Americans I know, will not have to look far within their own circles and families to find someone voicing their sickening attitudes toward humans whose differences are purely superficial.
What’s important is that Lovecraft didn’t dress up in black face, or endorse a return to slavery. I can try and put it in perspective by using Walt Disney as an example. Not for racism, but for his black listing of artists from his studios, pronouncing them communists and destroying their careers after they had participated in a strike. These artists were forced to give up their careers or move out of the country due to the McCarthism / Hooverism of the era. Taking a direct hand in destroying someone’s future is a terrible and malicious act. Do Mr. Disney’s action get brought up when we want to appreciate or discuss a Disney movie? I’d say almost never. Did Disney do other things that were admirable? Yes. What I’m trying to say, is that if you have a preconception about Lovecraft, but really don’t know much about the man and his work, then perhaps try and keep an open mind and give yourself another chance to properly explore or reappraise the subject matter. Perhaps you didn’t even see the real deal anyway?
For example, do you know of Lovecraft and Cthulhu from roleplaying games? Perhaps the Video games? Comics? Television pop culture references? These are all far removed from the original works of H.P. Lovecraft from the early 20th century. Few of these reinterpretations and adaptations reflect very well on H.P. Lovecraft’s actual stories, and most tend to re-imagine his monsters in a typical Christian sense of black & white, good vs evil. In fact, Lovecraft’s own nihilistic vision of man’s insignificance in the universe is much more materialistic and complex. Humans are confronted with the might of truly alien and omnipotent beings, whom they can not blow up or defeat. The best they can hope to do against these beings from the outer dimensions of space and time is duck, dodge, stay low and maybe use their wits to buy more time for human kind.
These monstrous pseudo-deities aren’t spending their time trying to corrupt people, or build up human cults to worship them. They could care less. That’s the irony and the intelligence of Lovecraft’s fictional world. The cults that worship these alien gods are deluded by their own human egotism and read magic and the supernatural into what they can not understand. It’s a sci-fi universe in which humans are not at the center. And if you don’t like that, you can always read 99% of all other sci-fi out there. The point, I think, is that Lovecraft offers something interesting and unique –at least as far as he was the original proponent of this type of cosmic level horror. It has gone on to inspire, most notably in my opinion, Stephen King. Think of Pennywise, Randal Flag or the creatures from the Mist being some off-the-top-of-my-head examples.So, what makes it fun to read Lovecraft’s work? Although Lovecraft’s literary style is heavily influenced by the old-fashioned prose of Edgar Allen Poe and Lord Dunsany, its quaintness is part of the charm. But the real magic comes from his imagination more than his execution. A lot of Lovecraft’s stories have purple prose and plot holes, but the concepts and the atmosphere are both awesome and creepy enough to get under your skin. His version of New England takes on a life of its own throughout the many stories set in the fictional locations north of Boston, such as Arkham (from which DC comics named Gotham city’s Arkham Asylum), Kingsport and Innsmouth. There are a million puzzle pieces for readers that help draw them into his universe and immerse you in it.
I personally think that Lovecraft’s stories being set in his own era of the 1920s and 1930s is the extra ingredient that really draws me into his New England world. I’ve always liked sci-fi and horror that is set in the past. I think this begun when I first saw the film Raiders of the Lost Ark. We can see the modern and futuristic sci-fi and horror any day, but Lovecraft’s world has all the sexiness of Boardwalk Empire, bootlegging gangsters, Downton Abbey and post-Edwardian class. Seeing people from this era dealing with the otherworldly lights up my imagination. As a kid raised on classic Doctor Who, I like a bit of horror and sci-fi mixed in with my history. It creates something special.
“Remember that as Lovecraft beat the twilight byways of New England –looking for insights that must remain nameless and ineffable to be spied just beyond the limits of our capacity for knowledge– he found not only horror, but beauty.” writer, Mark Laidlaw.
Lovecraft created a sandbox full of wonderful toys and ideas, and most amazingly he encouraged other writers to come and play. I don’t know of any other writer who was so non-proprietorial about the world he created and even though his works are now all in the public domain as of 2008, both during his short life time and for decades after, writers have delved into his spooky New England and the wider world and universe, for better or worse.
Lovecraft nurtured a huge amount of talent, simply through the amateur fiction boom of the early 20th century as well as corresponding with fans. Young budding writers such as Robert E. Howard, Robert Bloch, Frank Belknap Long, Donald Wandrei, August Derleth, E. Hoffman Price, and Fritz Leiber. Robert E. Howard was just 14 years old at the time Lovecraft wrote “The Terrible Old Man”. Lovecraft was born in 1890 and was not only of an older time, but might have seemed an intimidating figure for this young wave of pulp era writers to whom he was a hero.
“I think that’s soooo cool that he was encouraging younger writers. So many people do not have an appreciation for the next generation because they are threatened by them. Older artists just don’t like these kids, these people in general are just bashing kids which just drives me nuts. I think it’s so cool that he supported these younger writers and they gave back just as much. They were clearly interested in his work.” – Chad Fifer, H.P. Lovecraft Literary Podcast.
If you want to get started with Lovecraft, then I recommend listening to the H.P. Lovecraft Literary Podcast, aka HP Podcraft. All these episodes covering his stories are free to download from their website, and I believe via iTunes as well. I discovered them a few years ago and have listened to them over and over many times. It is a great companion for your first serious delving into these short stories and novellas, the text of all of which are available to read for free via HPLOVECRAFT.COM
Stephen King explicitly stated in his non-fiction book Danse Macabre that upon finding a copy of The Lurker in the Shadows left behind by his father, he knew that he wanted to be a writer. The book (as well as On Writing) makes perfectly clear his many influences as a writer, but the continued elements of recurring, omnipotent horrors and imperfect, complex heroes and villains in King’s books belie the overwhelming influence of Lovecraft on his work.
Excellent and balanced examination of the HPL conundrum, Rod.
Fun strip too!
I love the Dice Bag, perfect of Call of Cthulhu.
I’m holding out for the Hannah productions limited edition action figures. But then again, my wish list would include fully articulated lovecraft, Rawlings, and a heinlein figure with Kung fu grip.
Hehehe.
first.. yes they DO indeed bring that up about disney.. go check out Cracked.com.. they have a bunch of articles about how disney is racist(though the arguements are totally wrong) so it does indeed come up..
second point, disney did not make mccarthism, that was something that was happening with or with out disney.. but lets look at the end result of the “red scare” In god we trust shows up, some people didnt get to make movies or cartoon.. lets look at racism.. we got slavery, segregation, people still shooting and killing black people, a huge PR issue for your police.. i mean racism, unlike mccarthism STILL hurts people today.. and yes you are right, Robert E Howard was probably somewhat racist.. however he never had a character with a cat named “nigger jim” lovecraft on the other hand…. the worst that you see from howard is his descriptions of his african tribes men.. but that was common thinking back them.. but you leave out that lovecrafts racism was actually extreme enough then to be remarkable.. he was more so than others.
and unlike howard, lovecrafts xenophobia and racism are a huge part in his writing. Horror at red hook is about his fear of the races mixing, so is shadow over innsmouth.. much of his writing is about degenerate people mixing with pure people.. no you can not remove the racist from lovecraft and you cant hide it in pretty language or “they were all like that then” I really love lovecraft by the way.. i just think we need to be honest.. he was a great writer.. but probably a horrible person.. and that is ok
I never said a lot of what you’re implying I said. Where did I say Disney made McCarthyism? Sounds like you need to re-read my blog without your bias-glasses on.
S.T. Joshi makes some great points about Robert E. Howard’s works, not just Conan, HEAVILY steeped in his racism. There’s good and bad in everything. You watch a movie like the Green Mile and you can’t avoid the subject. It was an aspect of the world back then that was even more prevalent and unavoidable than it is now. It does not make it right. As for Lovecraft’s childhood cat being named what it was, look at the dog in the film the Dam Busters, and that was 1955. So a kid born in 1890 had a cat with a bad name. Why should we give him the 2015 political correctness treatment and act like that is a reason to block out the experience of good science fiction and horror writing?
You want to find modern thinkers with true humanity like Mark Twain and sadly they are the exception back then. But I am now being forced to repeat what I feel I already covered adequately in the blog.
As for people bringing up a character flaw with the mere mention of the man’s name, I don’t think that should prevent someone from delving deeper or examining the actual work. A lot of which is actually very good. A lot of which is indeed racist. And so was history. People who can not stomach history won’t be interested in approaching Lovecraft anyway. So my attempt to open some people’s eyes is probably all for naught. But if just one reader overlooks their preconceptions and has a good time discovering Lovecraftian worlds, then I’ll be glad I wrote the blog.
Does anyone else read Paul Gazis’ weekly blog/novel Flying Cloud? It’s set in an alternate 30’s Earth and has many nods and references to elder gods, plus a cameo appearance by HPL himself.
Oh, and squidbats too. Must not forget the squidbats.
Do you have a link? I’ll check it out.
http://paulgazis.com/FlyingCloud/001/FlyingCloud001.htm
Thanks! Bookmarked!
Which Lovecraft book/story would you suggest reading first? I don’t really enjoy podcasts but reading I like 🙂
As for the whole racist argument, if one flaw – however major – rules out enjoyment or respect then a lot of people who are revered should be ignored. This include Martin Luther King Jr. who cheated on his wife. But his poor choice doesn’t detract from his strong message and we – rightfully – respect him. So why should I punish authors for not having it all together? Especially ones that are dead – my boycott doesn’t communicate a message to them nor will it help them change. Anyway, my two cents.
I’d probably recommend Pickman’s Model as a quick and easy place to start. Shadow Over Innsmouth (novella), and The Case of Charles Dexter Ward (novel). If you want something REALLY creepy, then Thing on the Doorstep, for various reasons. http://www.hplovecraft.com/writings/texts/
A good starting point for Lovecraft newbies:
http://www.amazon.com/The-New-Annotated-Lovecraft-Books/dp/0871404532/ref=pd_bxgy_14_img_y
And regarding the difficulties of verlooking an artist’s prejudices, I recommend Stephen Fry on the subject. He made an entire film, but here’s a brief discussion with Craig Ferguson:
http://youtu.be/VwqUI8rgDGQ
Yes, it’s like saying, “I can’t listen to Wagner’s music, because of Wagner’s personal life and ignorance.” It’s anyone’s choice, but I do think there are certain levels of anything. Racism in particular comes in different quantities from people. There is the extreme end, where people are publicly vocal about their opinions and express themselves through violence. Then there is a whole sliding scale, that includes people on both sides of my family who hold racist views but self censor around others. It’s that same sliding scale that helped get several generations of Americans from pre-civil rights to the 21st century. There’s still a loooong way to go.
I have a hard time dealing with racist family members and people I encounter. I expect better of anyone, but particularly in the year 2015 as opposed to the early 20th century. But to say Lovecraft was a piece of shit because he held common contemporary views that stemmed from his own sheltered childhood, is willfully ignoring not only of context and scale, but ignorant of all of his positive qualities and actions. I have family members who I am ashamed of, but they, like most people, are more nuanced and complex and do have positive qualities along with their ignorance. However, should we judge closet racists and KKK members the same way? Regardless of your views, I think it is the actions someone takes that define just what a piece of shit they truly are.
If you purposefully try to destroy someone else’s life because of your prejudice then you’re not only more contemptible, but a bigger threat to society. That’s why I made the Walt Disney reference. Should Disney’s contribution to the blacklisting of the colleagues that pissed him off precede all conversations about the film Sleeping Beauty, or Aladdin? Should Lovecraft’s personal views, sadly part of the vogue of the late 19th and earlier 20th century, particularly in the USA, prevent the reading of his fiction work? Discussing racism is an extremely volatile subject, but sadly it is now turning off a generation from the works of writers from the 19th and early 20th centuries because suddenly we can’t separate history from being personally offended.